Describe the case.Find the decisionsthe same facts won.
SimilarCase ranks California WCAB decisions by legal-factor match and keeps the supporting source passage visible.
No sign-up · Sources stay visible
The corpus grows continuously — new decisions, factors, and regions are indexed as the project develops.
PDF · DOCX · voice · photo — the extractor reads them and lights up the legal factors the moment they land.
Two or three sharp questions close the holes that change rankings — nothing you already told us.
Ranked decisions, a factor-by-factor breakdown, and source passages with page references when the corpus provides them.
“…the QME failed to address activities of daily living…”
→ p.6✓Cumulative trauma: lumbar spine plus shoulder
✓Apportionment to degeneration disputed at trial
✗Their QME discussed ADL — yours does not
“The QME’s report does not constitute substantial medical evidence… he failed to explain how the injury affects the applicant’s activities of daily living.”
Illustrative example — real results quote the decision with its page
The issue types below come from indexed panel and en banc decisions — the counts are live corpus numbers, and they keep growing: new decisions and regions are added as the project develops. Launch focus: the Central Coast district offices (Salinas · Santa Barbara · San Luis Obispo).
Source provenance is retained; page references appear when extraction provides them.
- 3 searches
- Full factor breakdown
- No card
- Unlimited searches
- Memo export
- Share links
- Run history
- Shared matters
- Onboarding
- Priority support
Prices are launch placeholders — billing not live yet.