What the panel ordered
Findings and Award of WCJ dated August 31, 2001 affirmed with amendment substituting Reliance National Insurance Company as the liable insurer instead of Compuware Corporation; California Insurance Guarantee Association joined as party defendant; no sanctions imposed on Gallagher Bassett Services
Petition for reconsideration granted by Appeals Board en banc, reviewing WCJ Findings and Award dated August 31, 2001
What was disputed, and how it came out
Each issue the panel decided, with the reasoning it gave. An outcome is what this panel did on this record — not a rule, and not a prediction.
The Appeals Board en banc found that Reliance National Insurance Company, not Compuware Corporation, was the proper entity liable for benefits, and substituted Reliance in the WCJ's Findings and Award.
From the decision · page 125 The sole issue raised by Compuware in its petition for reconsideration is the entity against
The facts that decided it
What the panel treated as outcome-determinative, and which side it favoured.
Reliance National Insurance Company was the insurance carrier for Compuware Corporation at the time of injury and administered benefits after Compuware's self-insurance ended.
Favours Applicant prevailed
This fact led the Appeals Board to substitute Reliance as the liable entity for benefits instead of Compuware Corporation.
From the decision · page 314 1. Reliance National Insurance Company issued a valid California Workers'
The rules the panel named
Authorities as the decision cited them, with how this panel applied each one.
Labor Code section 115
Labor Code section 115
The Appeals Board en banc applied Labor Code section 115 to substitute the insurance carrier as the liable entity for benefits.
From the decision · page 21 After granting reconsideration, the Appeals Board issued an en banc decision1 on March
What proof carried it
The evidence the panel weighed, by kind.
Policy documents support finding that Reliance National Insurance Company was the insurer liable for benefits, not Compuware Corporation
From the decision · page 56 Based on our review of the exhibits submitted, the policy documents do support a finding
The same issues, filtered across the whole corpus — or paste your own facts and let the search rank by factor match.
About this page
- A published decision of the California Workers' Compensation Appeals Board, taken apart by what it turned on. The Board publishes the decision itself; this page adds the extraction and quotes the passage behind every claim.
- The injured worker is not named here, and the case caption is not printed. Physicians appear as the decision names them, because a medical opinion is an act in a public proceeding.
- Issues, outcomes and weights were extracted by AI and released only where the source passage checked. Read the official decision before relying on anything here. Not legal advice.
- If you are named in this decision and want this page removed, write to privacy@similarcase.com.