What the panel ordered
June 28, 2006 Findings and Order rescinded; case returned to trial level for further proceedings and decision
Petition for reconsideration granted; June 28, 2006 WCJ Findings and Order rescinded; case returned to trial level for further proceedings
What was disputed, and how it came out
Each issue the panel decided, with the reasoning it gave. An outcome is what this panel did on this record — not a rule, and not a prediction.
The lien claimant Ambulatory Surgery Center of Pomona did not have a fictitious-name permit from the Medical Board as required for clinics providing medical treatment, but it was unclear if it was claiming to provide medical treatment as a clinic or only outpatient setting services; the case was remanded for further proceedings to clarify and develop the record.
From the decision · page 116 We previously granted the petition for reconsideration of lien claimant, Ambulatory
The facts that decided it
What the panel treated as outcome-determinative, and which side it favoured.
Ambulatory Surgery Center of Pomona did not have a fictitious-name permit issued by the Medical Board as required for clinics providing medical treatment.