Authorities as the decision cited them, with how this panel applied each one.
Labor Code section 5313; Hamilton v. Lockheed Corporation (2001) 66 Cal.Comp.Cases 473
The WCJ is required to issue a decision that complies with Labor Code section 5313, making and filing findings upon all facts involved in the controversy to enable parties and the Board to ascertain the basis for the decision.
The WCJ's original decision lacked clarity on the specific statutes at issue and the date of injury, necessitating reconsideration and remand.
From the decision · page 4ECIC contends that the statute of limitations bars compensation herein. (Petition, at 2:5.)
However, it is not clear from the record which statutory time limitations are at issue. The WCJ is
required to issue a decision that complies with Labor Code section 5313. An adequate and
complete record is necessary to understand the basis for the WCJ's decision, and the WCJ shall
"...make and file findings upon all facts involved in the controversy[.]" (Lab. Code, § 5313;
Hamilton v. Lockheed Corporation (2001) 66 Cal.Comp.Cases 473, 476 [2001 Cal.Wrk.Comp.
LEXIS 4947] (Appeals Bd. en banc) (Hamilton).) As required by section 5313 and explained in
Hamilton, "the WCJ is charged with the responsibility of referring to the evidence in the opinion
on decision, and of clearly designating the evidence that forms the basis of the decision."
(Hamilton, supra, at 475.) The purpose of this requirement is to enable "the parties, and the Board
if reconsideration is sought, [to] ascertain the basis for the decision[.]" (Hamilton, supra, at 476,
citing Evans v. Workmen's Comp. Appeals Bd. (1968) 68 Cal.2d 753, 755 [33 Cal.Comp.Cases
350].)
McDaniel v. Workers' Comp. Appeals Bd. (1990) 218 Cal.App.3d 1011
The statute of limitations provisions vary depending on the situation; the WCJ must identify the specific statutory basis for the assertion that compensation is barred due to time limitations.
The lack of clear identification of the specific statutes at issue led to an inconsistent record and necessitated remand for clarification.
From the decision · page 4Here, in ADJ10390527 (CT ending June 29, 2002), the parties have placed in issue the
"statute of limitations," generally, without making reference to a specific statute. (August 17, 2020
Minutes, at 3:20.) In ADJ10256080 (CT ending December 18, 2014) and ADJ10256081 (CT
ending April 22, 2010), the parties have placed in issue the statute of limitations generally, with
further notation that the court is asked to address sections 5412 and 5405. (Id. at 5:3; 6:8.)
However, "[i]n California, the statutes of limitation consist of several provisions with varying
limits of time depending on the particular situation." (McDaniel v. Workers' Comp. Appeals Bd.
(1990) 218 Cal.App.3d 1011, 1016 [55 Cal. Comp. Cases 72].)
Reynolds v. Workmen's Comp. Appeals Bd. (1974) 12 Cal.3d 726
Failure to provide required notice regarding rights to file a claim and associated time limits tolls the statute of limitations under Reynolds v. Workmen's Comp. Appeals Bd. (1974) 12 Cal.3d 726.
The WCJ's original decision applied tolling due to failure of notice but did not address all relevant statutes or the date of injury under section 5412.
From the decision · page 3The WCJ issued the F&O on January 7, 2022, finding in pertinent part that "the statutes of
limitations" were tolled until the applicant was advised of the statutory deadlines for filing a claim
under Reynolds v. Workmen's Comp. Appeals Bd. (1974) 12 Cal.3d 726, 729 [39 Cal. Comp. Cases
768]. The opinion further determined that no claim form was ever provided to applicant by his
employer. Accordingly, the WCJ determined that none of the three continuous trauma applications
were barred by "any statute of limitations." (F&O, Joint Finding of Fact No. 1.)
Labor Code section 5412; J. T. Thorp v. WCAB (1984) 153 Cal.App.3d 327
The date of injury for cumulative trauma claims is governed by Labor Code section 5412, which defines the date as the time of compensable disability and knowledge of work-relatedness.
The WCJ must determine the date of injury under section 5412 to assess if claims are barred by the statute of limitations.
From the decision · page 7In cases involving an alleged cumulative trauma injury, the date of injury is governed by
Labor Code section 5412, which holds: