What the panel ordered
Petition for Reconsideration granted; final decision after reconsideration deferred pending further review
Petition for Reconsideration granted and final decision after reconsideration deferred
What was disputed, and how it came out
Each issue the panel decided, with the reasoning it gave. An outcome is what this panel did on this record — not a rule, and not a prediction.
The WCJ found applicant was the initial physical aggressor, but the Appeals Board granted reconsideration to further review the merits of this finding.
The WCJ found the May 3 claim barred by the statute of limitations, but the Appeals Board granted reconsideration to allow further development of the record and review of the tolling issues.
The facts that decided it
What the panel treated as outcome-determinative, and which side it favoured.