What the panel ordered
Petition for Reconsideration denied.
Applicant seeks reconsideration of the WCJ's Findings and Award of April 13, 2022, denying compensable industrial injury.
What was disputed, and how it came out
Each issue the panel decided, with the reasoning it gave. An outcome is what this panel did on this record — not a rule, and not a prediction.
AOE/COEDefendant prevailedcervical spine
The WCJ found the applicant's testimony not credible and relied on defendant's credible testimony, rejecting the medical opinion due to inadequate history, thus no substantial evidence of industrial causation was established.
From the decision · page 1Applicant seeks reconsideration of a workers' compensation administrative law judge's (WCJ) Findings and Award1 of April 13, 2022, wherein it was found that applicant did not sustain compensable industrial injury to her back, hands, hips, neck, face, legs and to her psyche while employed as an office manager during a cumulative period ending on March 31, 2017. The WCJ thus issued an order that applicant take nothing on account of her workers' compensation claim.
The facts that decided it
What the panel treated as outcome-determinative, and which side it favoured.