What the panel ordered
Petition for Reconsideration denied; Petition for Disqualification dismissed
Petition for Reconsideration filed by applicant on April 25, 2023, timely and verified; also treated as Petition for Disqualification of the WCJ
What was disputed, and how it came out
Each issue the panel decided, with the reasoning it gave. An outcome is what this panel did on this record — not a rule, and not a prediction.
Applicant did not meet burden of proof for industrial injury; WCJ report and medical evidence of Dr. Ann Davis were relied upon; petition lacked sufficient factual basis for disqualification
From the decision · page 3Applicant, in pro per, filed a Petition for Reconsideration on April 25, 2023. The Petition is timely and verified. The statutory grounds in the Petition are: By the order, decision or award; The board acted without or in excess of its powers; The evidence does not justify the findings of fact; the finding of facts do not support the order, decision or award. To wit the applicant offers the following assertions:
The facts that decided it
What the panel treated as outcome-determinative, and which side it favoured.