What the panel ordered
Order rescinding the Order taking Cases Nos. ADJ3704380 and ADJ4088542 off calendar issued by WCJ on February 4, 2026 is rescindedp. 2
Correction of clerical error in prior Opinion and Order Granting Petition for Reconsideration and Decision After Reconsideration served on July 17, 2026
This docket was decided more than once. Shown here is the latest released decision; we also hold July 17, 2026.
What was disputed, and how it came out
Each issue the panel decided, with the reasoning it gave. An outcome is what this panel did on this record — not a rule, and not a prediction.
The Appeals Board corrected a clerical error in the prior decision without granting reconsideration, as allowed by law.
From the decision · page 1It has come to the Appeals Board’s attention that the Opinion and Order Granting Petition for Reconsideration and Decision After Reconsideration served on July 17, 2026 contains a clerical error consisting of the omission of an Order rescinding the Order taking Cases Nos. ADJ3704380 and ADJ4088542 off calendar issued by the workers’ compensation administrative law judge (WCJ) on February 4, 2026. We correct this clerical error by virtue of this decision without granting reconsideration, as such errors may be corrected without further proceedings at any time. (Lab. Code, § 5803; 8 Cal. Code Regs., tit. 8, § 10986; see also 2 Cal. Workers’ Comp. Practice (Cont. Ed. Bar, March 2019 Update) Supplemental Proceedings, § 23.74, p. 23-76.) We add the following Order to those issued in our July 17, 2026 decision.
The facts that decided it
What the panel treated as outcome-determinative, and which side it favoured.
The prior Opinion and Order Granting Petition for Reconsideration and Decision After Reconsideration served on July 17, 2026 contained a clerical error omitting an Order rescinding the Order taking Cases Nos. ADJ3704380 and ADJ4088542 off calendar issued by the WCJ on February 4, 2026.
Favours Applicant prevailed
This omission was corrected by the Appeals Board without granting reconsideration, as allowed by law, resulting in the rescission of the prior order.
From the decision · page 1It has come to the Appeals Board’s attention that the Opinion and Order Granting Petition for Reconsideration and Decision After Reconsideration served on July 17, 2026 contains a clerical error consisting of the omission of an Order rescinding the Order taking Cases Nos. ADJ3704380 and ADJ4088542 off calendar issued by the workers’ compensation administrative law judge (WCJ) on February 4, 2026. We correct this clerical error by virtue of this decision without granting reconsideration, as such errors may be corrected without further proceedings at any time. (Lab. Code, § 5803; 8 Cal. Code Regs., tit. 8, § 10986; see also 2 Cal. Workers’ Comp. Practice (Cont. Ed. Bar, March 2019 Update) Supplemental Proceedings, § 23.74, p. 23-76.) We add the following Order to those issued in our July 17, 2026 decision.
The rules the panel named
Authorities as the decision cited them, with how this panel applied each one.
Lab. Code, § 5803; 8 Cal. Code Regs., tit. 8, § 10986
Correction of clerical errors without further proceedings at any time
The Appeals Board corrected the clerical error in the prior decision without granting reconsideration as permitted by these authorities.
From the decision · page 1It has come to the Appeals Board’s attention that the Opinion and Order Granting Petition for Reconsideration and Decision After Reconsideration served on July 17, 2026 contains a clerical error consisting of the omission of an Order rescinding the Order taking Cases Nos. ADJ3704380 and ADJ4088542 off calendar issued by the workers’ compensation administrative law judge (WCJ) on February 4, 2026. We correct this clerical error by virtue of this decision without granting reconsideration, as such errors may be corrected without further proceedings at any time. (Lab. Code, § 5803; 8 Cal. Code Regs., tit. 8, § 10986; see also 2 Cal. Workers’ Comp. Practice (Cont. Ed. Bar, March 2019 Update) Supplemental Proceedings, § 23.74, p. 23-76.) We add the following Order to those issued in our July 17, 2026 decision.
The same issues, filtered across the whole corpus — or paste your own facts and let the search rank by factor match.
About this page
- A published decision of the California Workers' Compensation Appeals Board, taken apart by what it turned on. The Board publishes the decision itself; this page adds the extraction and quotes the passage behind every claim.
- The injured worker is not named here, and the case caption is not printed. Physicians appear as the decision names them, because a medical opinion is an act in a public proceeding.
- Issues, outcomes and weights were extracted by AI and released only where the source passage checked. Read the official decision before relying on anything here. Not legal advice.
- If you are named in this decision and want this page removed, write to privacy@similarcase.com.