What the panel ordered
Petition for Reconsideration deniedp. 3
Petition for Reconsideration from WCJ's denial of Petition for Commutation of Award
What was disputed, and how it came out
Each issue the panel decided, with the reasoning it gave. An outcome is what this panel did on this record — not a rule, and not a prediction.
Applicant failed to meet burden of establishing that commutation is necessary for protection of applicant or in applicant's best interest, and failed to show commutation would avoid inequity and not cause undue expense or hardship
From the decision · page 1We have considered the allegations of the Petition for Reconsideration and the contents of the report of the presiding workers’ compensation administrative law judge (PWCJ) with respect thereto. Based on our review of the record, and for the reasons stated in the WCJ’s report, which we adopt and incorporate, we will deny reconsideration.
The facts that decided it
What the panel treated as outcome-determinative, and which side it favoured.
Applicant provided no documentary evidence to substantiate claimed monthly income, expenses, or shortfall amounts