What the panel ordered
Petition for Removal denied
Petition for Removal of the Order Suspending Action on Proposed Settlement filed by Defendant
What was disputed, and how it came out
Each issue the panel decided, with the reasoning it gave. An outcome is what this panel did on this record — not a rule, and not a prediction.
The petition for removal was denied because the petitioner failed to show significant prejudice or irreparable harm and because reconsideration would be an adequate remedy if a final adverse decision is issued.
From the decision · page 1Defendant seeks removal of the Order Suspending Action on Proposed Settlement (Order) issued on November 14, 2023, wherein the workers' compensation administrative law judge (WCJ) ordered that no action be taken on the parties' Stipulations With Request for Award until it is amended to contain their "wet" or actual signatures.
The facts that decided it
What the panel treated as outcome-determinative, and which side it favoured.
The petitioner failed to show significant prejudice or irreparable harm if removal was not granted.