What the panel ordered
Petition for Reconsideration denied
Petition for Reconsideration or Removal under LC § 5310 and CCR § 10955
What was disputed, and how it came out
Each issue the panel decided, with the reasoning it gave. An outcome is what this panel did on this record — not a rule, and not a prediction.
The petition challenged an interlocutory finding regarding the adequacy of the Medical Provider Network (MPN), and the Appeals Board found no significant prejudice or irreparable harm to justify removal, thus denying the petition.
From the decision · page 1We have considered the allegations of the "Petition for Reconsideration (or in the Alternative- Petition for Removal Per LC § 5310 and CCR § 10955)" and the contents of the report of the workers' compensation administrative law judge (WCJ) with respect thereto. Based on our review of the record, and based upon the WCJ's analysis of the merits of the petitioner's arguments in the WCJ's report, we will deny the Petition as one seeking reconsideration.
The facts that decided it
What the panel treated as outcome-determinative, and which side it favoured.