What the panel ordered
Petition for Removal dismissed as moot.
Petition for Removal filed by applicant from the May 29, 2025 WCJ decision continuing an expedited hearing to a regular trial date, later dismissed as moot after parties agreed to a joint continuance with a discovery plan.
What was disputed, and how it came out
Each issue the panel decided, with the reasoning it gave. An outcome is what this panel did on this record — not a rule, and not a prediction.
The Petition for Removal was dismissed as moot because the parties agreed to a joint continuance with a discovery plan, rendering the issue no longer live.
From the decision · page 2For the foregoing reasons, IT IS ORDERED that applicant's Petition for Removal of the order of continuance issued by the WCJ on May 29, 2025, is DISMISSED.
The facts that decided it
What the panel treated as outcome-determinative, and which side it favoured.
Parties agreed to a joint continuance with a discovery plan at the June 18, 2025 hearing.
Favours Defendant prevailed