What the panel ordered
Petition for Reconsideration denied.
Applicant seeks reconsideration of a WCJ's Findings and Order of January 5, 2026, denying industrial injury claim.
What was disputed, and how it came out
Each issue the panel decided, with the reasoning it gave. An outcome is what this panel did on this record — not a rule, and not a prediction.
AOE/COEDefendant prevailedright shoulder
The WCJ's credibility determinations were supported by substantial evidence, including witness testimony and applicant's inconsistent statements, leading to denial of industrial injury claim.
From the decision · page 1Applicant seeks reconsideration of a workers' compensation administrative law judge's (WCJ) Findings and Order of January 5, 2026, wherein it was found that applicant "did not sustain any injury arising out of and occurring in the course of employment." Applicant claimed that while employed on June 4, 2025 as an IT Analyst, he sustained industrial injury to his right shoulder.
The facts that decided it
What the panel treated as outcome-determinative, and which side it favoured.