What the panel ordered
Petition for Removal dismissed as mootp. 2
Petition for Removal from the Order Rescinding 3rd Amended Joint Findings & Order issued on June 4, 2026, by the WCJ
This docket was decided more than once. Shown here is the latest released decision; we also hold October 19, 2021.
What was disputed, and how it came out
Each issue the panel decided, with the reasoning it gave. An outcome is what this panel did on this record — not a rule, and not a prediction.
The petition was dismissed as moot because the WCJ returned the matter to the trial calendar and resubmitted it with the parties for decision rendering the petition moot.
From the decision · page 1Lien claimant has filed a Petition for Removal from the Order Rescinding 3rd Amended Joint Findings & Order issued on June 4, 2026, by the workers’ compensation administrative law judge (WCJ), alleging that the delay and additional proceedings would cause undue delay and irreparable harm. Thereafter, on July 14, 2026, the WCJ returned this matter to the trial calendar and resubmitted this matter with the parties for decision rendering the petition moot. Accordingly, we will dismiss the Petition for Removal. 1
The facts that decided it
What the panel treated as outcome-determinative, and which side it favoured.
The WCJ returned the matter to the trial calendar and resubmitted it with the parties for decision.
Favours Defendant prevailed
This action rendered the Petition for Removal moot, leading to its dismissal.
From the decision · page 1Lien claimant has filed a Petition for Removal from the Order Rescinding 3rd Amended Joint Findings & Order issued on June 4, 2026, by the workers’ compensation administrative law judge (WCJ), alleging that the delay and additional proceedings would cause undue delay and irreparable harm. Thereafter, on July 14, 2026, the WCJ returned this matter to the trial calendar and resubmitted this matter with the parties for decision rendering the petition moot. Accordingly, we will dismiss the Petition for Removal. 1
The same issues, filtered across the whole corpus — or paste your own facts and let the search rank by factor match.
About this page
- A published decision of the California Workers' Compensation Appeals Board, taken apart by what it turned on. The Board publishes the decision itself; this page adds the extraction and quotes the passage behind every claim.
- The injured worker is not named here, and the case caption is not printed. Physicians appear as the decision names them, because a medical opinion is an act in a public proceeding.
- Issues, outcomes and weights were extracted by AI and released only where the source passage checked. Read the official decision before relying on anything here. Not legal advice.
- If you are named in this decision and want this page removed, write to privacy@similarcase.com.