What the panel ordered
Petition for Removal denied
Petitions for Removal filed by Applicant and denied by the Appeals Board based on WCJ's analysis of the merits
What was disputed, and how it came out
Each issue the panel decided, with the reasoning it gave. An outcome is what this panel did on this record — not a rule, and not a prediction.
The Appeals Board denied the Petition for Removal because the petitioner did not show substantial prejudice or irreparable harm if removal was denied, nor that reconsideration would be inadequate if the matter proceeded to a final adverse decision.
From the decision · page 1Applicant, in pro per, filed Petitions for Removal on January 25, March 21, April 25, and May 27, 2022. We have considered the allegations of the Petitions for Removal and the contents of the reports of the workers' compensation administrative law judge (WCJ) with respect thereto. Based on our review of the record, and based upon the WCJ's analysis of the merits of petitioner's arguments in the WCJ's reports, we will deny removal.
The facts that decided it
What the panel treated as outcome-determinative, and which side it favoured.