What was disputed, and how it came out
Each issue the panel decided, with the reasoning it gave. An outcome is what this panel did on this record — not a rule, and not a prediction.
The Board found that the attorney fee award was reasonable based on the efforts and results obtained by lien claimant Sandra Castro, who assumed responsibility for the case and obtained a substantial settlement.
From the decision · page 6Applicant seems to be under the false impression that the only thing the court should have looked at in making the decision was the amount of time each person involved had the "file." This is his basis for reconsideration. That, however, is not the standard the court uses to determine distribution of disputed attorney's fees.
The facts that decided it
What the panel treated as outcome-determinative, and which side it favoured.
Lien claimant Sandra Castro assumed responsibility for the case on October 11, 2017, after a period of neglect.
Favours Defendant prevailed
This showed she exercised care and effectively used her time to advance the case, justifying the attorney fee award.
Favours Defendant prevailed
The substantial results obtained supported the reasonableness of the attorney fee awarded to her.