What the panel ordered
Applicant's Petition for Reconsideration is dismissed as untimely and as a successive petition raising no new evidence or issues.
Applicant, in pro per, filed a second petition for reconsideration after a prior petition was dismissed as untimely; the Appeals Board treated the correspondence as a petition for reconsideration and considered its timeliness and propriety.
This docket was decided more than once. Shown here is the latest released decision; we also hold January 12, 2024.
What was disputed, and how it came out
Each issue the panel decided, with the reasoning it gave. An outcome is what this panel did on this record — not a rule, and not a prediction.
The petition for reconsideration was filed 53 days after service of the prior decision, exceeding the 25-day jurisdictional limit, and no new evidence was presented to justify a successive petition.
From the decision · page 3The Opinion and Order was served on January 12, 2024. Based on the authority cited above, applicant had 25 days, or until Tuesday, February 6, 2024, to seek reconsideration on a timely basis. Therefore, the Petition for Reconsideration received by the Appeals Board 53 days later on March 5, 2024, is untimely and must be dismissed.