What the panel ordered
Petitions for Disqualification are dismissed as successive and improper.
Applicant filed two successive petitions for disqualification of Judge Geoffrey Simms, treated as Petitions for Disqualification.
What was disputed, and how it came out
Each issue the panel decided, with the reasoning it gave. An outcome is what this panel did on this record — not a rule, and not a prediction.
The petitions were dismissed as successive and improper because the applicant failed to show he was newly aggrieved, and the issues had been previously determined against him.
The facts that decided it
What the panel treated as outcome-determinative, and which side it favoured.
Applicant filed two motions to renew disqualification of Judge Geoffrey Simms on February 2 and 3, 2021.
Favours Defendant prevailed
These motions were treated as successive petitions for disqualification and dismissed because the applicant was not newly aggrieved.