The whole released corpus, not the closest twelve. Filter by issue and outcome, kind, year, office, Labor Code section, or holding. Each row is the ADJ number, the disposition with its page, and the official PDF. To search by a fact pattern, use /explore.
Released decisions
5,374
Matching these filters
15
Page
1 of 1
Released decisions15 of 5,374
Decision
Issues · outcome
Disposition
Open
ADJ292246 →Jul 1, 2026 · San FranciscoPanel decision
Can I browse all released California WCAB panel decisions?+−
Yes. This list is the released corpus, filterable by issue and outcome, kind, year, district office, Labor Code section, or holding. Each row is the ADJ number, disposition, and official PDF — not a claimant name.
Should I search by facts instead?+−
If you have a dispute to paste, use /explore. This page is for scanning or filtering the whole set, not ranking by similarity.
Why is an older panel missing?+−
Most of the ordinary panel archive here starts in 2021. En banc files go further back. Coverage and the gaps are listed on /california/coverage. Filtered views are not separate indexable pages.
Published panel decisions, almost all since 2021: the litigated tail of a system that mostly settles. Issues and outcomes were extracted by AI and released only where the source passage checked. A row is a decision, never a claimant. Not legal advice.
Decision after reconsideration issued on April 7, 2025, rescinding the January 7, 2025 decision and substituting findings and orders including replacement of Dr. John Finkenberg as orthopedic QME.
Petition for Reconsideration granted; original Findings and Order of July 26, 2024 rescinded and substituted with new Findings and Order requiring applicant to appear in person for deposition in California with costs paid by defendant; all other issues deferred
The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board affirmed the WCJ's finding that the applicant's claim is barred pursuant to Labor Code section 3600.5(d)(1)(B).
Order by WCJ on June 11, 2020 affirmed; September 21, 2018 Opinion affirmed with amendment to refer matter to Presiding Judge for special master appointment; Petition for Reconsideration dismissed
WCJ's decision affirmed; AD Rule 30(d)(3) invalidated; defendant entitled to request QME panel after denial of injury claim; case remanded for further proceedings.