The whole released corpus, not the closest twelve. Filter by issue and outcome, kind, year, office, Labor Code section, or holding. Each row is the ADJ number, the disposition with its page, and the official PDF. To search by a fact pattern, use /explore.
The WCAB en banc rescinded the WCJ's April 19, 2022 Findings of Fact and Order and returned the matter to the trial level for further proceedings consistent with its decision, directing defendant to disclose all entities liable for payment and all insurance policies impacting liability, as required by Coldiron I and II and WCAB Rule 10390.
Can I browse all released California WCAB panel decisions?+−
Yes. This list is the released corpus, filterable by issue and outcome, kind, year, district office, Labor Code section, or holding. Each row is the ADJ number, disposition, and official PDF — not a claimant name.
Should I search by facts instead?+−
If you have a dispute to paste, use /explore. This page is for scanning or filtering the whole set, not ranking by similarity.
Why is an older panel missing?+−
Most of the ordinary panel archive here starts in 2021. En banc files go further back. Coverage and the gaps are listed on /california/coverage. Filtered views are not separate indexable pages.
Published panel decisions, almost all since 2021: the litigated tail of a system that mostly settles. Issues and outcomes were extracted by AI and released only where the source passage checked. A row is a decision, never a claimant. Not legal advice.
The Appeals Board ordered that the suspension of WCAB Rule 10628 remains in place from March 18, 2020 through the applicant 1, 2022, after which the amended rule providing for electronic service became effective.
Order allowing certain documents to be emailed directly to the Appeals Board and district offices during the applicant-19 state of emergency, overriding prior rule prohibiting email filings.
February 27, 2014 en banc decision rescinded; Petition for Reconsideration filed by applicant denied; September 20, 2013 Findings and Order of WCJ affirmed
The WCAB en banc rescinded the WCJ's September 23, 2013 decision and returned the matter to the WCJ for further proceedings to determine whether the spinal surgery is reasonably required.
The WCJ's January 24, 2011 decision is rescinded; the Bengals are dismissed as a defendant; the case is returned to the trial level for further proceedings and decision by the WCJ.
The Appeals Board en banc rescinded the WCJ's Findings and Order of September 21, 2012, and returned the matter to the trial level for further proceedings and new decision by the WCJ.
The Appeals Board (en banc) affirmed the WCJ's August 7, 2012 Findings and Order, declining to exercise jurisdiction over applicant's workers' compensation claim based on the forum selection clause in the employment contract.
The Appeals Board affirmed its September 26, 2011 en banc decision, except it amended the decision to clarify that its principles apply prospectively from September 26, 2011.
WCJ's decision affirmed; AD Rule 30(d)(3) invalidated; defendant entitled to request QME panel after denial of injury claim; case remanded for further proceedings.
The Appeals Board affirmed the May 8, 2003 Supplemental Findings and Award of the WCJ, confirming the correct legal identity of the employer as 'Erez Boostan, an individual and dba American Runner Attorney Service' and denying UEF's petition for reconsideration.