Where this sits
- Chapter 4.5.
- Division of Workers' Compensation
- Subchapter 2. Workers' Compensation Appeals Board--Rules and Practice Procedure
- Article 1. General
The regulation, as printed
Authority and history
Note: Authority cited: Sections 133, 5307, 5309 and 5708, Labor Code. Reference: Sections 20, 110(a), 5300, 5307, 5309, 5500, 5500.3, 5501, 5501.5, 5501.6, 5502, 5700 and 5701, Labor Code.
1. Renumbering of former section 10301 to section 10305, including amendment of section and Note, filed 12-17-2019; operative 1-1-2020. Submitted to OAL for printing only pursuant to Government Code section 11351 (Register 2019, No. 51). 2. Amendment filed 12-15-2021; operative 1-1-2022 pursuant to Government Code section 11343.4(b)(3). Submitted to OAL for filing and printing only pursuant to Government Code section 11351 (Register 2021, No. 51).
What panels did with this rule
Released decisions that named § 10305, with the passage each turned on. A panel decision persuades; it does not bind.
- ADJ16767852 · 2025-05-09 · Pomona District Office8 CCR § 10305
Determinative passage · p.2DISCUSSION WCAB Rule 10305(c) states that: "'Appear'" means to act on behalf of any party." Each applicant and defendant shall appear or have an attorney or non-attorney representative appear at all hearings pertaining to the case in chief. (Cal. Code Regs., tit. 8, § 10752(a).) A WCJ may issue a notice of intention pursuant to WCAB Rule 10832 for failure to comply with this rule. (Cal. Code Regs., tit. 8, § 10752(e), 10832.) Further, WCAB Rule 10832(e) states that "An order with a clause rendering the order null and void if an objection is received is not a Notice of Intention and must be served by the Workers' Compensation Appeals Board." Here, applicant's attorney appeared at the trial on November 16, 2023, and therefore, there was no violation of WCAB Rule 10752(a). As there was no basis for a notice to dismiss, the Order is void ab initio. We also note that since the Order stated that it would be effective if there was no timely objection and without a further order (a "self destruct" order), it should have been served by the WCAB, and the WCJ's choice to designate service to defendant provides another basis for our conclusion that the Order is void.
Applicant's attorney appeared at trial, so no violation of appearance rule; order was void ab initio and improperly served.
Official decision · page 2 → - ADJ20015360 · 2024-12-06 · Los Angeles District Office8 CCR § 10305
Determinative passage · p.1It has come to the attention of the Appeals Board that defendant City of Los Angeles has sought reconsideration of the decision issued on June 4, 2024, by a workers' compensation arbitrator (WCA) under Labor Code1 section 3201.7. The Petition for Reconsideration is attached as an exhibit to the Writ of Review filed with the Second Appellate District on October 28, 2024, and served on the Appeals Board at WCABWritUnit@dir.ca.gov.
The Appeals Board reviewed the procedural history and rules regarding filing and timeliness, accepted the petition despite email filing error, and granted reconsideration to ensure due process.
Official decision · page 1 → - ADJ13725819 · 2023-09-29 · Redding District Office8 CCR § 10305
Determinative passage · p.5Turning to appearances at trial, WCAB Rule 10752, subdivision (a) requires that: "each applicant and defendant shall appear or have an attorney or non-attorney representative appear at all hearings pertaining to the case in chief." (Cal. Code Regs., tit. 8, § 10752(a), emphasis added.) Pursuant to WCAB Rule 10305(c), "`Appearance' means a party or their representative's presence, pursuant to section 5700, at any hearing." (Cal. Code Regs., tit. 8, § 10305(c), emphasis added.) Section 5700 provides in relevant part that: "Either party may be present at any hearing, in person, by attorney, or by any other agent...." (Lab. Code, § 5700.) These rules presume that an appearance is made by a natural person,5 whether licensed or not, and that an "appearance" is not made by a legal entity, such as a law firm. That is, because the statutory and regulatory scheme presumes that representation is by a natural person, the appearance requirement also presumes that an appearance is by a natural person. Hence, by the same logic, only a natural person can fail to appear.
Applicant appeared at trial, satisfying the appearance requirement; a legal entity cannot fail to appear, so the attorney's non-appearance was not a failure to appear.
Official decision · page 5 → - ADJ16801627 · 2023-09-15 · Fresno District Office8 CCR § 10305
Determinative passage · p.1Labor Code section 5700 provides in relevant part that: "Either party may be present at any hearing, in person, by attorney, or by any other agent, and may present testimony pertinent under the pleadings." WCAB Rule 10305(c) states that: "'Appearance' means a party or their representative's presence, pursuant to Labor Code 5700, at any hearing." (Cal. Code Regs., tit. 8, § 10305(c).) WCAB Rule 10752, subdivision (a) requires that: "each applicant and defendant shall appear or have an attorney or non-attorney representative appear at all hearings pertaining to the case in chief," and subdivision (d) states in pertinent part that: "Any appearance not required by this rule may be noticed pursuant to rule 10642 or ordered by the Workers' Compensation Appeals Board." (Cal. Code Regs., tit. 8, § 10752(a), (d).)
Defines 'appearance' for parties or representatives at hearings.
Official decision · page 1 → - ADJ15597591 · 2022-09-12 · Pomona District Office8 CCR § 10305
Determinative passage · p.2DISCUSSION The WCJ may issue a notice of intention for any proper purpose. (Cal. Code Regs., tit. 8, § 10832 (a).) A proper purpose includes, but is not limited to, (1) Allowing, disallowing or dismissing a lien; (2) Granting, denying or dismissing a petition; (3) Sanctioning a party; (4) Submitting the matter on the record; or (5) Dismissing an application. (Id.) "Either party may be present at any hearing, in person, by attorney, or by any other agent, and may present testimony pertinent under the pleadings." (Lab. Code, § 5700, italics added.) Each applicant and defendant shall appear or have an attorney or non-attorney representative appear at all hearings pertaining to the case in chief. (Cal. Code Regs., tit. 8, § 10752(a), italics added.) Appearance means a party or their representative's presence at any hearing. (Cal. Code Regs., tit. 8, § 10305(c), italics added.) Therefore, the appearance of applicant's representative at the hearing satisfied the appearance requirement. As applicant met the requirement for appearing at the hearing by having his representative attend, the NIT was not issued for a proper purpose. Therefore, the NIT was invalid. Accordingly, we grant applicant's Petition, rescind the June 22, 2022, Order, and return the matter to the WCJ for further proceedings consistent with this decision.
The appearance of applicant's representative satisfied the appearance requirement.
Official decision · page 2 →
Rules beside this one
Article 1. General — regulations rarely stand alone, and the answer is often two sections away.