The whole released corpus, not the closest twelve. Filter by issue and outcome, kind, year, office, Labor Code section, or holding. Each row is the ADJ number, the disposition with its page, and the official PDF. To search by a fact pattern, use /explore.
Can I browse all released California WCAB panel decisions?+−
Yes. This list is the released corpus, filterable by issue and outcome, kind, year, district office, Labor Code section, or holding. Each row is the ADJ number, disposition, and official PDF — not a claimant name.
Should I search by facts instead?+−
If you have a dispute to paste, use /explore. This page is for scanning or filtering the whole set, not ranking by similarity.
Why is an older panel missing?+−
Most of the ordinary panel archive here starts in 2021. En banc files go further back. Coverage and the gaps are listed on /california/coverage. Filtered views are not separate indexable pages.
Published panel decisions, almost all since 2021: the litigated tail of a system that mostly settles. Issues and outcomes were extracted by AI and released only where the source passage checked. A row is a decision, never a claimant. Not legal advice.
The Appeals Board rescinded the May 6, 2004 WCJ decision and remanded the matter to the WCJ to allow the defendant a reasonable time to initiate the AME/QME procedure and for the WCJ to redetermine the applicant's entitlement to right shoulder surgery after completion of the AME/QME procedure.
WCJ's July 21, 2004 Findings and Award and Order rescinded; matter remanded to trial level for further proceedings and new decision consistent with en banc opinionp. 13
Affirmed the WCJ's Findings and Award of April 23, 2004, including permanent disability, apportionment under old law, and need for further medical treatment
Findings and Award of March 24, 2004, adopted and affirmed except Findings of Fact Nos. 14 and 15 and the Award in its entirety are stricken; section 5814 penalty against CIGA rescinded.
The Appeals Board rescinded its July 15, 2002 decision and reinstated and affirmed the June 4, 2001 panel decision that CIGA is not required to pay the Employment Development Department.
The Appeals Board affirmed the May 8, 2003 Supplemental Findings and Award of the WCJ, confirming the correct legal identity of the employer as 'Erez Boostan, an individual and dba American Runner Attorney Service' and denying UEF's petition for reconsideration.
The Appeals Board rescinded the Findings and Orders issued July 15, 2002, and returned the matter to the WCJ for analysis of the evidence in accordance with the principles set forth in the decision and for a new decision thereafter.
The Appeals Board affirmed the WCJ's Findings and Order, holding that the special employer's insurer's policy constitutes 'other insurance' relieving CIGA of liability, and dismissed CIGA as a party defendant.
The Board rescinded the August 9, 2002 Findings and Order and remanded the matter to the WCJ for further proceedings and a new decision consistent with the en banc opinion.
Findings and Award of WCJ dated August 31, 2001 affirmed with amendment substituting Reliance National Insurance Company as the liable insurer instead of Compuware Corporation; California Insurance Guarantee Association joined as party defendant; no sanctions imposed on Gallagher Bassett Services
The Board rescinded the WCJ's decisions and held that Labor Code section 4650(d) applies only to periodic indemnity payments and not to lump sum commutations or compromise and release proceeds, thus no penalty under section 4650(d) or 5814 applies to such lump sum payments.
The Board reversed the panel decision disallowing EDD's lien and held that CIGA is liable for EDD's lien as a covered claim under Insurance Code section 1063.1(c)(1)(vi). The WCJ's findings were reinstated and amended to allow EDD's lien with jurisdiction reserved for further proceedings on industrial injury and extent of recovery.
The Board affirmed the WCJ's decision except it rescinded the appointment of Dr. Angerman as a medical evaluator and returned the matter to the trial level for further development of the medical record from Drs. Sobol and Berman.
The Board affirmed the WCJ's decision that defendant unreasonably delayed payment of permanent disability indemnity and assessed a 10 percent penalty under Labor Code section 5814 against the entire award of permanent disability benefits.
Sanctions awarded against Valley Subrogation and Associates for filing an untimely petition for reconsideration without reasonable justification; Valley Subrogation ordered to pay attorney's fees and costs to defendant, The Vons Company, Inc.
The Board affirmed the WCJ's decision that the applicant could select a new treating physician and was entitled to the recommended further medical treatment.
Findings of Fact dated August 22, 2000 rescinded; matter returned to the workers' compensation administrative law judge for further proceedings and new decision consistent with the Board's opinion.
The Board amended and affirmed the Supplemental Findings and Award of April 26, 2000, holding that the section 5814 penalty for failure to pay the section 4650(d) penalty applies to all permanent disability indemnity, past, present, and future, as increased by the section 4650(d) penalty and prior section 5814 penalty.
The Appeals Board granted reconsideration, rescinded the prior en banc decision of January 24, 2007, and affirmed the WCJ's Findings and Award of October 23, 2006, applying the 2005 Schedule for Rating Permanent Disabilities.