The whole released corpus, not the closest twelve. Filter by issue and outcome, kind, year, office, Labor Code section, or holding. Each row is the ADJ number, the disposition with its page, and the official PDF. To search by a fact pattern, use /explore.
The WCAB panel dismissed the Petition for Reconsideration as untimely and recommended the matter be returned to the WCJ to treat the Petition as a Petition to Set Aside the Order and hold a hearing to create a record on good cause to vacate or reinstate the Application.
Can I browse all released California WCAB panel decisions?+−
Yes. This list is the released corpus, filterable by issue and outcome, kind, year, district office, Labor Code section, or holding. Each row is the ADJ number, disposition, and official PDF — not a claimant name.
Should I search by facts instead?+−
If you have a dispute to paste, use /explore. This page is for scanning or filtering the whole set, not ranking by similarity.
Why is an older panel missing?+−
Most of the ordinary panel archive here starts in 2021. En banc files go further back. Coverage and the gaps are listed on /california/coverage. Filtered views are not separate indexable pages.
Published panel decisions, almost all since 2021: the litigated tail of a system that mostly settles. Issues and outcomes were extracted by AI and released only where the source passage checked. A row is a decision, never a claimant. Not legal advice.
The Appeals Board rescinded the WCJ Findings and Order of July 20, 2021, and substituted new Findings that applicant sustained injury to psyche and internal system arising out of employment, and that compensation is not barred by Labor Code section 3208.5(h).
Affirmed WCJ Findings and Order except amended to find widow entitled to reimbursement for home health care services from July 4, 2018 to October 17, 2019; deferred issues of reimbursement to daughter and amounts owed
The WCAB rescinded the WCJ's Findings and Order and returned the case to the trial level for further proceedings consistent with the opinion after reconsideration.
Petition for Reconsideration granted; original Findings of Fact, Order rescinded and substituted with new Findings of Fact, Order finding applicant did not receive the supplemental job displacement voucher mailed on or around December 24, 2019; all other issues deferred.
Petition for Reconsideration by defendant is denied, affirming the December 1, 2025 Opinion and Order Granting Petition for Reconsideration and Decision after Reconsideration.
Petition for Reconsideration granted solely to admit applicant's exhibits 1-15 into evidence; otherwise, the Findings and Order of November 20, 2025, affirmed.
The WCJ's Findings and Order of September 22, 2025, is rescinded and the matter is returned to the trial level for further proceedings consistent with the opinion.
The WCAB granted reconsideration, rescinded the WCJ's August 18, 2025 Findings and Order, and returned the matter to the trial level for further proceedings consistent with the opinion.
Joint Findings, Order Vacating Submission and Orders Developing the Record issued by the WCJ on December 2, 2024 is rescinded; matter returned to trial level for further proceedings.
Petition for removal granted to amend the Findings of Fact and Order; the original F&O issued on June 11, 2025, is rescinded and substituted per the WCJ's Report; matter returned to trial level for further proceedings.
The WCAB en banc rescinded the WCJ's April 19, 2022 Findings of Fact and Order and returned the matter to the trial level for further proceedings consistent with its decision, directing defendant to disclose all entities liable for payment and all insurance policies impacting liability, as required by Coldiron I and II and WCAB Rule 10390.
The en banc Appeals Board rescinded the WCJ's April 19, 2022 Findings of Fact and Order and returned the matter to the trial level for further proceedings consistent with the en banc decision.
Petition for removal granted; May 31, 2024 WCJ orders affirmed except amended to state QME reports are not substantial medical evidence and returning to QME is not fruitful.
Cost petitioner entitled to payment for subpoena to San Diego Orthopedic Associates Medical Group; not entitled to payment for subpoena to Sedgwick; no bad faith or frivolous conduct by cost petitioner; issue of defendant's bad faith deferred
Petition for Reconsideration granted; February 19, 2025 Findings and Award rescinded and substituted; issues deferred and additional QME panels ordered; matter returned to trial judge for further proceedings